@winne208
I'm so happy to see Zhang Jingna being part of this segment. She pioneered a lawsuit and won, creating hope for fellow art creators. I've been following her since her trial, and the amount of hate she got was insane. People wanted to justify stealing others' works so much that her identity, location, private information were doxxed and spreaded like wildfire, just for protecting her own work rights. Many people can't understand the dangers of letting technology go out of control but she understood and despite continuously being stepped down by others, she is still fighting for fellow artists' rights. Right now there are deepflakes, misinformation, countless scams going around thanks to the lack of law and care surrounding this topic. Tremendous respect to her.
@roadfactz
That comment Jingna made "Artist and creator are being harm by their own works" just hit really deep..
@bloomingblossom5269
"It's the end of times. We humans no longer believed in ourselves" - Hayao Miyazaki in "Kingdom of Dreams" documentary
@PEN-N-PAL
If you read all the comments, talentless people don't care, they have nothing to lose until AI takes away their job and career, then they feel they have some grievance someone needs to listen to.
@MetalGearMk3
Also AI is ruining the search engine. If I want non AI search results, that's not possible right now. Pinterest is ruin as a reference images website.
@CorinneIsIn
The biggest mistake was allowing any AI generative platform to use ANY data for free.
@patl4668
As an artist, Iām glad she fights the fight for all future artists.
@fabricioestevam6297
Someone explain to me how Zhang Jingna lost a case so clearly in her favor. There has to be something totally wrong with this judge's perception.
@Tharros95
Oh wow, you guys actually did your research and had Jigna and Ben Zhao. Seriously well done.
@PEN-N-PAL
AI art should be governed and fall in the same category as the music industry rules. AI art is the same as music sampling, taking someone else's creation and reproducing it without their permission or consent "is" and "should be" illegal. Copying is copying, and AI is "piracy" and a "bootleg" representation of original artwork(s). There's no rationale that makes AI art legal.
@Onurahi
AI supporters say "Well, now you (artists) will need to get a real job." While they don't understand, that AI will cause a giant outbreak of "lazy" content creators, who are hungering for easy profits by posting AI-generated works (which are AGAIN based on real artist's works without any prior consent). And OH the nerve these governments and AI companies have, to say post factum that "It already happened, the data has already been mined and used. Nothing we can do about it." Imagine a guy steal a whole truck of gold bars, melt it into golden statues and sell it to somebody in another country. Only to protect himself, by saying "Meh, it is already done. Nothing i can do about it."
@ro4online
Zhang Jingna don't lose focus. Continue expressing and creating art and continue the lawsuit. šµš
@roxy.saints
and yet we can't sue these people who created the AI app for copyright. this is absurd
@artfx9
AI should never be considered art. It's only an imitation of it.
@pbusedtogiveaf
17:51 Going on Fiverr to hire an "ai artist" is EXTREMELY DUMB because most of these tools are free or cost about $10/mo, like how stupid and lazy you need to be to outsource that to someone for pay. Especially when there are real artists with various styles and skill level from around the world on that platform whom you can commission
@BERSERKTHIRD
Nowadays, drawings painted or drawn on paper are even more valuable because we know that they were created by an artist.
@shadowolf31520
we stand with Cara
@luwel00
omg. they interview zhang jingna whoever directed this did an amazing job
@grumpfieldthecat4652
Heart-breaking. The issue is not with the AI, but with those shameless humans who claim authorship over AI work they generated by typing in a few words. They are just new era thieves.
@jj8888z